Call us on 1300 794 893

The Experts

Will low interest rates save the economy?

Goldman and Bloom
Monday, May 16, 2016

Bookmark and Share

By Steve Goldman and James Bloom

Global markets appear to be struggling to come to terms with their own set of ‘relationship breakdowns’. News searches for words containing ‘economic dislocation’ and ‘financial dislocation’ throw back an alarming number of articles, particularly over the last few months. Financial markets appear to react in more and more erratic and volatile ways following release of economic information and policymaker statements. 

An early March speech by an IMF spokesman cited “adverse feedback loops between the real economy and markets”, and given the delicacy of global economic recovery, “where risk of economic derailment has grown”. 

We appear to have reached the limit of our understanding of the long-term effects of continuing low and negative rates on global growth, employment, inflation and interest rates. With the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) recent cut, the 650th globally since the global financial crisis, central banks have largely failed to solicit the desired growth response. Are further marginal cuts still effective, or will they cause further reductions in growth? 

There is little market consensus. Many participants believe rates should remain low in order to continue to force savers into taking risks in order to get returns. Keep your money in the bank, get zero or negative returns. Keep your money in government bonds, get zero or negative returns. Other participants believe rates need to rise in order to stop people from being forced to save even more for retirement, given lower expected future investment income with reduced rates.

When saving can hurt the economy

In 1936, Keynes’ General Theory popularised The Paradox of Thrift; that is when people save more, they spend less, which results in a drop in consumption, spiralling into lower growth and employment and ultimately causing economies to fall deeper into recession. The Paradox of Thrift concept had largely fallen from mainstream economic dialogue until its re-emergence as an explanation for Japan’s long-term on/off recessionary environment of the last 20+ years. Lower rates had actually caused savers to save more for retirement resulting in a chronic downward spiral, leading to perpetually low growth and inflation. 

However, The Paradox of Thrift concept originated well before Keynes. Proverbs 11:24 states “There is that scattereth, and yet increaseth; and there is that withholdeth more than is meet, but it tendeth to poverty.” Or in better English - savings may hurt an economy.

Kapstream has historically expressed scepticism over the effectiveness of lower rates in stimulating growth. It forces more saving and is mainly beneficial to people who already own risky financial assets – mostly rich people who have a lower marginal propensity to consume increasing wealth. Rather than printing money to purchase financial assets, a more effective policy would be to print money to build things – roads, railways, bridges. Put more people to work with a higher marginal propensity to spend. 

Globally, political will to increase fiscal spending is low, which has led to monetary policy becoming the only choice across much of the world. We remain supportive of the Australian government’s fiscal plans, which we believe will be more effective than further reductions in the RBA’s discount rate. The complementary fiscal and monetary stimulus announced in the new budget will aid the domestic economy in limiting the downside effects of deteriorating global growth. We remain sceptical of arguments centred around credit rating cuts, due to deteriorating fiscal balances having a negative long-term impact on the economy. At 19% debt/GDP, Australia retains amongst the lowest levels of outstanding debt in the developed world. A belief that debt costs will rise with a lower rating (for both the government and corporates) is not connected to any recent economic reality. And it would be hard to argue that the skills required to build the unprecedented mining/commodity infrastructure of the past decades aren’t compatible with building roads, railways, and bridges.

On the monetary side, we expect further RBA cuts later in the year, but dependent upon how well the global economy holds up in the coming months and how resilient the AUD remains. The Australian unemployment story has held up remarkably well, reaching a 2½ year low in March, and is forecast to fall from 5.7% to 5.5% over the next year. 

What does this mean for portfolios?

The ‘what to do’ in the face of this ongoing uncertainty and volatility continues to challenge both global policymakers and investment professionals. Recent volatility, increasing regulatory pressures and lower market liquidity has created both challenges and opportunities.

Kapstream focuses on high-quality, low volatility, short-dated bonds. And corporate bond yield advantages over cash rates continue to grow in this uncertain environment. Today, we find investment grade bonds that have considerably higher yield advantages versus what has existed over the past few years. Has the probability of default worsened? No. Do we feel it any less likely that these borrowers will be able to pay the interest on their bonds? No. We feel you get paid better than ever to take the default risk in corporate bonds today. 

The trick is to assemble a portfolio that provides attractive returns over cash whilst at the same time maintaining capital preservation and lower prospects for downside losses.

Over the past year, we had maintained a historically more conservative portfolio – cash and government-related securities were increased to 20% to 25% while duration exposure was retained near a long-term average of 0.75 years. More recently, we increased the fund’s overall duration ahead of the RBA’s announcement, reaching about 1 year duration, given our view of lower Australian inflation over the longer-run leading to an eventual series of RBA rate cuts. We expect to continue to reduce the fund’s ‘liquidity bucket’ of government-related and cash instruments from a current 16% position toward 10% over the coming months as attractive corporate issuance opportunities continue to emerge.

Financial dislocation and greater market volatility appear to becoming the norm. It’s becoming much harder to understand the impact of continued policy leverage on financial markets. While we believe further rate cuts will likely have less impact and be harder to assess than those made before, we intend to continue to focus on what we can analyse with a greater degree of certainty – business fundamentals, credit quality, market liquidity, and default risk.

Disclaimer: Unless otherwise specified, any information contained in this publication is current as at the date of this report and is provided by Fidante Partners Limited (ABN 94 002 835 592, AFSL 234668) the issuer of the Kapstream Wholesale Absolute Return Income Fund (ARSN 124 152 790) (Fund). Kapstream Capital Pty Limited (ABN 19 122 076 117, AFSL 308870) is the investment manager of the Fund. It should be regarded as general information only rather than advice. It has been prepared without taking account of any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of that, each person should, before acting on any such information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to their objectives, financial situation and needs. Each person should obtain the relevant Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to the Fund and consider that PDS before making any decision about the Fund. A copy of the PDS can be obtained from your financial adviser, our Investor Services team on 13 51 53, or on our website If you acquire or hold the product, we and/or a Fidante Partners related company will receive fees and other benefits which are generally disclosed in the PDS or other disclosure document for the product. Neither Fidante Partners nor a Fidante Partners related company and our respective employees receive any specific remuneration for any advice provided to you. However, financial advisers (including some Fidante Partners related companies) may receive fees or commissions if they provide advice to you or arrange for you to invest in the Fund. Kapstream Capital, some or all Fidante Partners related companies and directors of those companies may benefit from fees, commissions and other benefits received by another group company.

Published: Monday, May 16, 2016

New on Switzer

blog comments powered by Disqus
Pixel_admin_thumb_300x300 Pixel_admin_thumb_300x300